Yes, this is part and parcel of the intangible asset but how do you deal with multiple parties with different take on the intangible worth.
For instance, if A has done work in country 1 and B has done work in country 1 and 2, then who has more reputation? Again its hard to qualify because if 2 has done little work (but still some) in country 1, then would A have more leeway in determining leadership role compared to B? Or what happens when the collective (A and B) want to go into country 2?
Now I understand why the concept of intangible asset and brand value is so hard to understand. Makes it even tougher when each have their own definition of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment