Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Kylie X concert in Singapore
Monday, November 24, 2008
Patents: quality or quantity?
Even more incredulous, is this is a premeir organization! naturally I find such debate to be so silly because it is quite obvious quality will trump quantity any time of the day, especially in technology.
However, admittedly there are situations where quantity is more important and one of the situation warranting such a model would be when an organization is trying to create and incentivize their r n d department.
I had gone through this same exercise when I was part of an organization bringing r n d into a traditionally manufacturing complex. Patents were alien to this people, and we had drawn people from manufacturing to man the development teams, with a sprinkling of new graduates like myself. The boss was an old hand in r n d, and had crafted a scheme to encourage disclosures of potential patents by just putting forth a 4 slide ppt.
his scheme was idiot-proof:
Slide 1: introduction and problem statement
Slide 2: your solution
Slide 3: more details of your solution
Slide 4: cost savings as a result of adopting this thingamajig
Not perfect, but it got the ball rolling.
But past the initial 2 years, the internal patenting committee put up additional barriers and lifted the hurdle higher such that we introduced more quality into the pipeline.
Now this was for an organization that at best had basic engineering degree holders with a few graduate degrees and post-grads.
How about for an organization where you had tons of post-grads? Shouldn't this NOT even be a question? (re: quality vs quantity). If quantity ruled the day, would be throwing hard earned money after useless technology patents, or can we afford to play the numbers' game and let fate decide?
In any situation, I'd advocate quality and especially in this tough climate, we need to make tougher decisions instead of molly-collding the egos of these people.
Sound-off : what do you think?
Monday, November 17, 2008
Sound-off: does age matter when deciding value one brings to the table?
Recently I have been trying to approach a potential client to offer my services to his organization. We had a good discussion I felt, and I am planning to do a show and tell to the rest of his group come the new year.
But I understood he had some queries on the number of years I have under my belt, ie I'm too young and indirectly perhaps fears on whether I can properly represent what I said to him or not.
While I don't hold it against anyone, but fundamentally the answer should be: does age matter?
arguably I can understand and justify his concern, afterall, he will be the one trying to rally his colleagues to attend the show and tell on his behalf come the new year, so if I am too wet behind the ears, the surely it will impact is reputation and that of his boss as well.
So for this case, I intend to show him what I am made of. If the work I had done had sufficiently impressed the ex-CEO of a listed company, then I think it should do for him, his colleagues and his boss as well.
enough said for my experience, but I would like to expand that to the larger picture of singapore and perhaps the asian countries.
Entrepreneurial activity in the US is mainly done by fresh grads or your people, with a few grey haired serial entrepreneurs thrown into the soup. And yet they are able to survive. I haven't done extensive research into whether they are able to thrive without a grey haired Ceo or not, but google is a good case study. I believe (and I could be very wrong here) that sergei brin and larry page got their start and first customers before eric schimdt came on board (he was the grey haired boss). VC and angels all judged them by the technology they had and as well as the customers. It was only later when they were in the growth mode did the Board bring in Eric.
Here if everyone expects an older boss to always helm the venture, then where does that leave our younger generation of entrepreneurs? Are they then doomed to failure from the onset or do they justify bringing in an older person as CEO and possibly high salary and higher burn rate at the same time?
For my case, I am thankful that my potential client had not raise his private thoughts to his boss, and that he was willing to give me a chance to prove my mettle to his colleagues, I guess some of whom may not be as forgiving.
As I said when the show and tell comes, then the proof will be in the pudding.
But what do you think? is this experience prevalent in this part of the world or not?